DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7oO1 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JSR
Docket No: NR5283-14
1A August fy Al
Dear Staff Sergeans
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
2h three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 August 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation
Review Board (PERB), dated 17 April 2014, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB.
The Board found nothing adverse in the uncontested fitness
report for 1 April 2007 to 3 March 2008, which you believe to
have been influenced by the incident of January 2007, or in the
uncontested report for 1 November 2006 to 31 March 2007, during
which the incident occurred. In view of the above, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
- ar de
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to ali official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
1 SD in Bo
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05757-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found the alcohol-related incident cited in the contested fitness report was not a minor matter that did not warrant mentioning. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04310-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2O37O~51OOBJGDocket No:4310-0714 June 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) hasdirected modifying the contested fitness report for 1 April 2004to 31 March 2005 by changing the ending date, from 31 March 2005to 27 April 2005; and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02424-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found the fitness report for 1 January to 21 May 2007 should stand, though it disagreed with the PERB position that the removal of the report for 3 November to 31 December 2006 nullified your objection to not having been counseled before your mark in section G.2 (“Decision Making...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03634-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-blOOBJGDocket No:3634-0710 May 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval-record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the uncontested fitness report for 1 May to 25 October 2005 by removing section K (reviewing officer’s marks and comments).A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3238 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03250-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJGDocket No:3250-0711 May 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.You requested removing the fitness report for 5 January to 30September 2003 and replacing it with an administrative fillerthrough 14 April 2004.It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08813-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, the Board noted paragraph 4009.1.d of Marine Corps Order P1610.7F, which states the following: Reporting officials must view the term subordinates in a generic sense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06201-07
After thorough review, the Board found that the petitioner was not in the unit described in section “A”, item 2c, for the fitness report covering the period 20060301 to 20060424 (FD). Regarding the fitness report covering the period 20060801 to 20061020 (CH), the Board found that the reporting senior andSubj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OFreviewing officer are the rightful reporting officials for the period covered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11210-10
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from the third sighting officer addendum page, “This report is a valid adverse report due to MRO [Marine reported on] receiving a 6105 counseling.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 November 2010. In this regard, the Board was unable to find the lateness harmed your ability to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07981-98
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 9 November 1998, a copy of which is attached. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. As a final matter, the petitioner's prior and subsequent fitness reports have absolutely no relevancy on the issues Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION...